Home | About CytoJournalEditorial Board | Archived articles | Search CytoJ Articles | Subscribe | Peer review policies | CytoJournal Quiz Cases
  Reviewer corner | Author corner | OA Steward’s corner | CF member’s corner | Join as CF member | Manuscript submission | Open Access (OA) Advocacy
Home
CytoJournal All 'FULL TEXT' in HTML are FREE under "open access" charter of CytoJournal.
To login for downloading any PDF OR to request TOC (Table of Content) by e-mail, please click here
Home Email this page Print this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size Cytopathology Foundation
Navigate here
  Search
 
 » Next article
 » Previous article 
 » Browse articles
  
Resource links
 »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »  Article in PDF (782 KB)
 »  Citation Manager
 »  Access Statistics
 »  Reader Comments
 »  Email Alert *
 »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
 »  Abstract
 »  Background
 »  Materials and me...
 »  Results
 »  Discussion
 »  Competing interests
 »  Authors' contrib...
 »  References
 »  Article Figures
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed21394    
    Printed114    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded525    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 31    

Recommend this journal

 


 
RESEARCH
CytoJournal 2006,  3:28

Malignant atypical cell in urine cytology : A diagnostic dilemma


1 Department of cytology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
2 Department of Histopathology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Date of Submission21-Oct-2006
Date of Acceptance15-Dec-2006
Date of Web Publication15-Dec-2006

Correspondence Address:
Pranab Dey
Department of cytology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.1186/1742-6413-3-28

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 

Aims: The aim of this study was to find out the characteristic morphology of malignant atypical cells which were missed on routine cytology of urine.
Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, we examined detailed cytomorphology of 18 cases of atypical urinary cytology which were missed on routine examination and were further proved on histopathology as transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of bladder. The cytological features of these cases were compared with 10 cases of benign urine samples.
Results:
There were 11 cases of high grade TCC and 7 cases of low grade TCC on histopathology of the atypical urine samples. Necrosis in the background and necrosed papillae were mostly seen in malignant atypical cells. The comet cells and cells with India ink nuclei (single cells with deep black structure-less nuclei) were only observed in malignant atypical cells. The most consistent features in malignant atypical cells were: i) high nuclear and cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio ii) nuclear pleomorphism iii) nuclear margin irregularity iv) hyperchromasia and v) chromatin abnormalities
Conclusion: The present study emphasizes that nuclear features such as high N/C ratio, hyperchromasia and chromatin abnormalities are particularly useful for assessing the malignant atypical cells. Other cytological features such as comet cells and cells with India ink nuclei are also helpful for diagnosis but have limited value because they are less frequently seen.



How to cite this article:
Bhatia A, Dey P, Kakkar N, Srinivasan R, Nijhawan R. Malignant atypical cell in urine cytology : A diagnostic dilemma. CytoJournal 2006;3:28

How to cite this URL:
Bhatia A, Dey P, Kakkar N, Srinivasan R, Nijhawan R. Malignant atypical cell in urine cytology : A diagnostic dilemma. CytoJournal [serial online] 2006 [cited 2017 May 27];3:28. Available from: http://www.cytojournal.com/text.asp?2006/3/1/28/41224



 » Background Top


Urine cytology for screening of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) has been used for long time. Despite the advent of several newer techniques for screening and diagnosis of urothelial malignancies, cytomorphology still remains an important tool [1]. "Atypical cells" in urine have been recognized and studied time and again [2,3]. The accurate interpretation of the character of "Atypical cell" in urine is a major challenge for cytopathologists. In this present paper we analyzed the characteristic morphology of malignant atypical cells which were missed on routine cytology of urine.


 » Materials and methods Top


A total of 2997 voided urine samples received in our laboratory over a period of one and half year (January 2005-June 2006) were studied. A total of 58 urine samples reported as positive for atypical cells were initially selected. Out of these cases, the histological correlation was available in 54 samples (18 cases, three consecutive samples) and these were finally selected for the present study. Out of these, 11 cases were reported as high grade papillary urothelial carcinoma and 7 cases were reported as low grade papillary urothelial carcinoma on histology according to International society of urological pathology classification system [4].

Also cytomorphology of 30 samples (10 cases) of non-neoplastic urinary samples were compared with these atypical urinary samples. These cases were negative for malignancy on cystoscopy and follow up history.

Two Papanicolaou stained smears were examined for each sample. The slides were seen by two independent observers (AB and PD).

The detailed cytological features such as cellularity, cell clustering, papillae, comet cells, India-ink cells, necrosis, apoptosis, nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio, cytoplasmic detail, nuclear pleomorphism, nuclear margin, hyperchromasia, and chromatin abnormalities were observed.


 » Results Top


There were a total of 18 malignant atypical cases in this study. The cytological features are highlighted in [Table 1] and [Table 2]. Most of our atypical cases had increased cellularity (11). In two of the cases, the inflammatory cells were obscuring the field and atypical cells were scattered singly or in tiny clusters in between them. Cellularity was low in three cases due to a haemorrhagic background. The cell clustering was observed in 11 cases however in most of them the clusters were few [Figure 1],[Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. Only one case with high grade papillary urothelial carcinoma showed many large clusters [Figure 4]. The comet cells and cells with India ink nuclei (single cells with deep black structure-less nuclei) were observed in total seven and five cases respectively [Figure 5]. Necrosis, both in background as well as necrosed papillae [Figure 4] were observed in 50% of the cases and these were commonly observed in high grade papillary urothelial carcinoma.

Apoptosis is the active process of programmed death of cells without provoking any inflammatory responses. The cell death by apoptotic process was detected on the smear without much difficulty. The individual apoptotic cells were present singly. The cells were round to oval, smaller in size with dense cytoplasm. In addition the apoptotic cells showed dark, pyknotic nuclei of variable sizes. Apoptosis (9 cases) was more commonly observed in high grade tumors although it was also noted in some low grade tumors (3) Spindle shaped cells were identified in 3 cases [Figure 6]. One case showed significant degenerative changes in the smear.

In majority of the cases (15) the atypical cells showed alteration in shape and size [Table 2]. The cytoplasmic changes in the form of paleness and angulations were observed in 7 of our patients [Figure 7]. Four most consistently observed features in atypical cells were: i) high nuclear: cytoplasmic ratio (83.3%) ii) nuclear pleomorphism (94.4%) iii) nuclear margin irregularity (88.9%) and iv) hyperchromasia (94.4%) [Figure 7],[Figure 8]. These features were present irrespective of the grade of tumors. Chromatin abnormalities either in the form of coarse clumping or a homogenous pattern was also noted (100%).

In contrast to the above, the non-neoplastic samples were characterized by a low cellularity. Cell clusters were tiny and cells were in groups of 4-5, in contrast from neoplastic clusters which were small to large (5-40 cells). Comet, India-ink and apoptotic cells were not observed in any of the non-neoplastic samples. Necrosis was focal, however diffuse background necrosis was seen in two cases with accompanying heavy inflammation. In non neoplastic lesions, occasional mildly pleomorphic cells were observed, however cytoplasmic changes and the other nuclear changes such as high nuclear: cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio, hyperchromasia and abnormal chromatin pattern were consistently absent [Table 3].


 » Discussion Top


Urine cytology is an important non-invasive technique for screening, diagnosis and follow-up of patients with urinary bladder cancer. Despite the advancement in laboratory equipment for processing of the specimens and availability of ancillary techniques for diagnosis, difficulties are still encountered in some cases [5]. In these cases, the recognition of exact nature of the "atypical cells" in urine is really difficult.

Increased cellularity and cell clustering was previously mentioned as helpful in diagnosis of malignancy [2], however in our study we noted these features in many benign urine samples also. This may be due to the fact that exfoliation of transitional cells can be caused by a variety of diseases like lithiasis, instrumentation, inflammatory diseases and benign prostatic hyperplasia [6]. In the present study papillae, India ink nuclei and comet cells were noted exclusively in malignant cases. However these features had low frequency for diagnosis of malignancy. The necrosis was seen exclusively in malignancies in previous studies [1]. We noted necrosis in 40% of our non-neoplastic smears also. Apoptosis however was observed only in malignant atypical smears of high grade TCC in histology.

Alterations in nuclear morphology were most consistently observed in the malignant atypical cells. High N/C ratio, hyperchromasia, chromatin alterations, nuclear pleomorphism and irregular nuclear margins were most frequently encountered features in malignant atypical cells. Out of these, the first three features were seen only in malignant atypical cells. Raab et al [1] in their study on low grade papillary urothelial neoplasms mentioned that high N/C ratio, irregular borders and cytoplasmic homogeneity are the key diagnostic criteria. In our study, the nuclear pleomorphism and margin irregularities were seen more frequently in malignant atypical smears and rarely observed in few benign cases.

Cytoplasmic changes in the form of angulations and paleness were seen in malignant atypical cases. However, the frequency of these features was low.

Spindle shaped cells were seen in 3 of our cases and the histopathology report in all 3 of them was high grade papillary urothelial carcinoma. Previous studies have also mentioned a similar association of spindle cells with TCC [2,5].

The major challenge for the cytopathologist lies in distinguishing between a low grade transitional cell carcinoma and reactive atypia due to stone, viral infections, instrumentation and chemotherapy [7]. In our study, the above mentioned nuclear features combined with a relevant clinical history were of great help in differential diagnosis. Maier et al [8] also found better results when more clinical information was made available to the pathologist and standard protocol was used for collection of urine specimens.

There was considerable overlap in the features observed in low grade and high grade tumors. However certain features like necrosis, apoptosis, nuclear and chromatin changes were more frequent or more severe in high grade lesions.

The various ancillary techniques could be combined with cytomorphology to increase the diagnostic accuracy include monoclonal antibodies to cytokeratin20 [9], flow cytometry of bladder irrigation specimens [10], cytogenetics [11] and nuclear morphometry [12].

In brief, we noted that the presence of India ink cell, comet cells and apoptotic cells were solely present in malignancy related atypia. Along with these, the nuclear features like high N/C ratio, hyperchromasia and chromatin abnormalities are particularly useful in diagnosis of malignancy. The newer ancillary techniques could be used along with routine microscopic examination to increase the diagnostic accuracy.


 » Competing interests Top


The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.


 » Authors' contributions Top


AB: Acquisition of data and drafting the manuscript

PD: 1) Conception, design, analysis and interpretation of data and 2) final approval of the version to be published.

NK, SR, RN: Analysis and interpretation of data

 
 » References Top

1.Raab SS, Julia LC, Michael CB: Low grade transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: Cytologic diagnosis by key features asidentified by logistic regression analysis. Cancer 1994, 74: 1621-6.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Deshpande V, McKee GT: Analysis of atypical urine cytology in a tertiary care center. Cancer 2005, 105 (6) : 468-75.   Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Renshaw AA: Subclassifying a typical urinary cytology specimens. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2000, 90: 222-229.   Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VR, Mostofi FK: The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee. Am J Surg Pathol 1998, 22: 1435-48.   Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Pattari SK, Dey P: Urine: Beyond cytology for detection of malignancy. Diagn cytopathol 2002, 27: 139-42.   Back to cited text no. 5    
6.DeMay R: The art and science of cytopathology. Volume 1 . Chicago: ASCP Press; 1996.   Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Murata S, Kishikawa T, Isojima Y, Tsuchihashi Y, Katoh R: Unusual cytologic findings in low grade papillary transitional cell carcinoma. Acta Cytol 2004, 48 (4) : 492-6.   Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Maier U, Simak R, Neuhold N: The clinical value of urinarycytology :12 years of experience with 615 patients. J Clin Pathol 1995, 48: 314-17.   Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Moll R, Lowe A, Laufer J, Franke WW: Cytokeratin 20 inhuman carcinomas. A new histodiagnostic marker detected by monoclonal antibodies. Am J Pathol 1992, 140: 427.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Kumar UN, Dey P, Mondal AK, Singh SK, Vohra H: DNA flow cytometry and bladder irrigation cytology in detection of bladder carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2001, 24: 153-6.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Lonn U, Lonn S, Nylen U, Friberg S, Stenkvist B: Gene Amplification Detected in Carcinoma Cells From Human Urinary Bladder Washings by the Polymerase Chain Reaction Method. Cancer 1993, 71: 3605-10.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Borland RN, Partin AW, Epstein IJ, Brendler CB: The use of nuclear morphometry in predicting recurrence of transitional cell carcinoma. J Urol 1993, 149: 272-5.  Back to cited text no. 12    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Atypical/malignant urothelial cells in routine urinary sediment: Worth knowing and reporting
G.B. Fogazzi,F. Pallotti,G. Garigali
Clinica Chimica Acta. 2015; 439: 107
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Atypical urothelial tissue fragments in noninstrumented voided urine specimens are associated with low but significantly higher rates of urothelial neoplasia than benign-appearing urothelial tissue fragments
Irem Onur,Dorothy L. Rosenthal,Christopher J. VandenBussche
Cancer Cytopathology. 2015; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Clinical Value of Dividing False Positive Urine Cytology Findings into Three Categories: Atypical, Indeterminate, and Suspicious of Malignancy
Kazumasa Matsumoto,Masaomi Ikeda,Takahiro Hirayama,Morihiro Nishi,Tetsuo Fujita,Manabu Hattori,Yuichi Sato,Makoto Ohbu,Masatsugu Iwam
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2014; 15(5): 2251
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Subclassifying atypia in urine cytology: What are the helpful features?
Zulfia McCroskey,Burak Bahar,Zhihong Hu,Eva M. Wojcik,Güliz A. Barkan
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Diagnostic terminology for urinary cytology reports including the new subcategories ‘atypical urothelial cells of undetermined significance’ (AUC-US) and ‘cannot exclude high grade’ (AUC-H)
E. Piaton,M. Decaussin-Petrucci,F. Mege-Lechevallier,A.-S. Advenier,M. Devonec,A. Ruffion
Cytopathology. 2013; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Significance of Atypical Category in Voided Urine Specimens prepared by liquid based technology: Experience of a Single Institution
Samuel Barasch,Michael Choi,Jimmie Stewart,Kasturi Das
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology. 2013;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Evaluation of atypical urine cytology progression to malignancy
Julianne Muus Ubago,Vikas Mehta,Eva M. Wojcik,Güliz A. Barkan
Cancer Cytopathology. 2013; 121(7): 387
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 UroVysion® multiprobe FISH in the triage of equivocal urinary cytology cases
Lukas Bubendorf,Éric Piaton
Annales de Pathologie. 2012; 32(6): e52
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Citodiagnóstico urinario: aspectos de interés para el citotécnico
Rafael Martínez Girón,Julio Velasco Alonso
Revista Española de Patología. 2012; 45(4): 204
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Cytological and Morphometric Study of Urinary Epithelial Cells with Histopathological Correlation
Asim Kumar Manna,Manisha Sarkar,Ujjal Bandyopadhyay,Srabani Chakrabarti,Swapan Pathak,Diptendra Kumar Sarkar
Indian Journal of Surgery. 2012;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 L’hybridation in situ en fluorescence (FISH) utilisant le kit multisonde UroVysion® dans les cytologies urinaires atypiques
Eric Piaton,Lukas Bubendorf
Annales de Pathologie. 2012; 32(6): 438
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Accuracy of urine cytology and the significance of an atypical category
Brimo, F., Vollmer, R.T., Case, B., Aprikian, A., Kassouf, W., Auger, M.
American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2009; 132(5): 785-793
[Pubmed]
13 High-grade urothelial carcinoma: Comparison of SurePath liquid-based processing with cytospin processing
David Y. Lu,Aziza Nassar,Momin T. Siddiqui
Diagnostic Cytopathology. 2009; 37(1): 16
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 The Significance of Persistent Abnormal Urine Cytology
Sang Wook Park,In Ho Chang,June Hyun Han,Kyung Won Kawk,Seung Hyun Ahn
Korean Journal of Urology. 2009; 50(2): 125
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 The significance of persistent abnormal urine cytology
Park, S.W., Chang, I.H., Han, J.H., Kawk, K.W., Ahn, S.H.
Korean Journal of Urology. 2009; 50(2): 125-129
[Pubmed]
16 High-grade urothelial carcinoma: Comparison of SurePath liquid-based processing with cytospin processing
Lu, D.Y. and Nassar, A. and Siddiqui, M.T.
Diagnostic Cytopathology. 2009; 37(1): 16-20
[Pubmed]
17 Utilidad de la citologia de orina para el diagnostico del carcinoma vesical: estudio comparativo con biopsia Usefulness of urine cytology for bladder carcinoma diagnosis: comparative study with biopsy
Garcia Castro, MA and Fernandez Fernandez, E. and Martin Corriente, MC and Garcia Hernandez, S. and Alvarez-Arguelles Cabrera, H.
Actas Urol Esp. 2008; 32(9)
[Pubmed]
18 Bladder cancer: an update
Turner, B.
International Journal of Urological Nursing. 2008; 2(3): 91-102
[Pubmed]
19 Bladder cancer: an update
Bruce Turner
International Journal of Urological Nursing. 2008; 2(3): 91
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 Diagnostic significance of ‘atypia’ in instrumented versus voided urine specimens
Umesh Kapur,Girish Venkataraman,Eva M. Wojcik
Cancer. 2008; 114(4): 270
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
21 The significance of atypical urine cytology in the face of normal investigations-Is extended investigation and follow-up required?
Streeter, E.H., Turner, G.D.H., McCormick, R., Roberts, I.S., Crew, J.
British Journal of Medical and Surgical Urology. 2008; 1(3): 131-135
[Pubmed]
22 Usefulness of urine cytology for bladder carcinoma diagnosis. Comparative study with biopsy | [Utilidad de la citología de orina para el diagnóstico del carcinoma vesical: Estudio comparativo con biopsia]
García Castro, M.A., Fernández Fernández, E., Martín Corriente, M.C., García Hernández, S., Álvarez Argüelles Cabrera, H.
Actas Urologicas Espanolas. 2008; 32(9): 904-907
[Pubmed]
23 The significance of atypical urine cytology in the face of normal investigations—Is extended investigation and follow-up required?
E.H. Streeter, G.D.H. Turner, R. McCormick, I.S. Roberts, J. Crew
British Journal of Medical and Surgical Urology. 2008; 1(3): 131
[VIEW] | [DOI]
24 CytoJournalæs move to the new platform: More on financial model to the support open-access charter in cytopathology, publication quality indicators, and other issues
Shidham, VB and Pitman, MB and DeMay, RM and Atkinson, BF
CytoJournal. 2008; 5(1): 15
[Pubmed]
25 Diagnostic significance ofæatypiaæin instrumented versus voided urine specimens
Kapur, U. and Venkataraman, G. and Wojcik, E.M.
Cancer. 2008; 114(4): 270-274
[Pubmed]
26 Noninvasive diagnosis of bladder cancer by detection of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) and their inhibitor (TIMP-2) in urine
Eissa, S. and Ali-Labib, R. and Swellam, M. and Bassiony, M. and Tash, F. and El-Zayat, T.M.
European Urology. 2007; 52(5): 1388-1397
[Pubmed]
27 Time for evidence-based cytology
Dey, P.
CytoJournal. 2007; 4(1): 1
[Pubmed]
28 The best in CytoJournal: 2006
Cohen, M.B.
CytoJournal. 2007; 4(1): 12
[Pubmed]
29 Journal List> Available Issues> Table of Contents> Full-text
Park, S.H. and Kim, D.G.
Korean J Radiol. 2007; 8(4): 264-275
[Pubmed]
30 Noninvasive Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer by Detection of Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) and Their Inhibitor (TIMP-2) in Urine
Sanaa Eissa,Randa Ali-Labib,Menha Swellam,Manal Bassiony,Fathy Tash,Tarek Mostafa El-Zayat
European Urology. 2007; 52(5): 1388
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
31 Thank you reviewers-CytoJournal 2007
Shidham, V.B. and Atkinson, B.F.
CytoJournal. 2007; 4(1): 4
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Previous article Next article

    

  Site Map | Copyright and Disclaimer
© 2007 - CytoJournal | A journal by Cytopathology Foundation Inc with Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
New version online since 1st July '08
Open Access