Home | About CytoJournalEditorial Board | Archived articles | Search CytoJ Articles | Subscribe | Peer review policies | CytoJournal Quiz Cases
  Reviewer corner | Author corner | OA Steward’s corner | CF member’s corner | Join as CF member | Manuscript submission | Open Access (OA) Advocacy
Home
CytoJournal All 'FULL TEXT' in HTML are FREE under "open access" charter of CytoJournal.
To login for downloading any PDF OR to request TOC (Table of Content) by e-mail, please click here
Home Email this page Print this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size Cytopathology Foundation
Navigate here
  Search
 
  
Resource links
 »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »  Article in PDF (1,621 KB)
 »  Citation Manager
 »  Access Statistics
 »  Reader Comments
 »  Email Alert *
 »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
 »  Abstract
 » Introduction
 »  Materials and Me...
 » Case Report
 » Discussion
 »  Competing Intere...
 »  Authorship State...
 »  Ethics Statement...
 »  List of Abbrevia...
 »  References
 »  Article Figures
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed265    
    Printed3    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Browse articles
CASE REPORT
CytoJournal 2017,  14:15

Metastatic prostatic stromal sarcoma: A challenging diagnosis on fine-needle aspiration with broad differential diagnosis


1 Department of Pathology, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
2 Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
3 St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA

Date of Submission04-Sep-2016
Date of Acceptance13-Feb-2017
Date of Web Publication20-Jun-2017

Correspondence Address:
Muhammad Siddique Khurram
Department of Pathology, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/cytojournal.cytojournal_46_16

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 

Prostatic stromal sarcomas (PSS) are rare solid organ mesenchymal sarcomas. PSS may pose difficult diagnostic challenges on fine needle aspiration biopsy. We report a 48-year-old man diagnosed with metastatic high grade prostatic stromal sarcoma by a CT-scan guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of a right lower lung lobe nodule. We reviewed the literature on the epidemiologic, cyto-histological, and immunophenotypic findings and discussed the differential diagnosis for this rare entity.


Keywords: Fine-needle aspiration, high-grade, metastatic, prostate, stromal sarcoma


How to cite this article:
Khurram MS, Tranesh G, Sakhi R, Hamza A, Ibrar W, Bano R. Metastatic prostatic stromal sarcoma: A challenging diagnosis on fine-needle aspiration with broad differential diagnosis. CytoJournal 2017;14:15

How to cite this URL:
Khurram MS, Tranesh G, Sakhi R, Hamza A, Ibrar W, Bano R. Metastatic prostatic stromal sarcoma: A challenging diagnosis on fine-needle aspiration with broad differential diagnosis. CytoJournal [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Jul 24];14:15. Available from: http://www.cytojournal.com/text.asp?2017/14/1/15/208567

Editorial/peer-Review Statement
To ensure the integrity and highest quality of CytoJournal publications, the review process of this manuscript was conducted under a double-blind model (authors are blinded for reviewers and vice versa) through automatic online system.



 » Introduction Top


Prostatic stromal sarcomas (PSSs) are malignant cellular spindle cell tumors of specialized prostatic stromal cells. PSS include pure mesenchymal and mixed epithelial stromal (phyllodes) tumors.[1] More than half of patients with PSS are younger than 50 years old. Majority of the patients present with lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary retention.[2] PSS may form solid or partially cystic masses which may contain necrosis.[3] PSS have broad differential diagnosis includes sarcomatoid squamous cell carcinoma (SSCC), malignant spindle cell melanoma, malignant solitary fibrous tumor (MSFT), atypical carcinoid tumor (ACT), metastatic fibrosarcoma (FS), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), primitive neuroendocrine tumor/Ewing sarcoma (PNET/ES), and leiomyosarcoma (LMS). The main modality for treatment is radical prostatectomy with chemotherapy. Recent literature showed that PSS have high rate of local recurrence and distant metastasis.[4]


 » Materials and Methods Top


Computed tomography (CT)-guided fine -needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy was performed using a 21-gauge needle on a lung nodule. Material from the FNA was expelled onto glass slides and smeared. Some of the smears were air-dried and stained with Diff-Quik stain. The remaining smears were immediately wet fixed with 95% ethyl alcohol and stained with Papanicolaou (PAP) stain. Material for cell block was rinsed from the needle in 10% neutral buffered formalin.[5] Paraffin-embedded sections from the cell block were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Immunohistochemistry stains were performed on unstained sections of formalin fixed, paraffin embedded cell block by the standard avidin–biotin technique. The panel of antibodies used included pancytokeratin (cytokeratin [CK] adverse event 1/3 [AE1/AE3]), CK 7, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), progesterone receptor (PR), estrogen receptor (ER), thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1), prostatic specific antigen (PSA), CD117, S100, CD34, actin, napsin A, desmin, melan A, and vimentin.


 » Case Report Top


Subject

A 48-year-old Puerto Rican male patient with a history of recurrent lower urinary tract infections and urine retention. The medical history of the patient is remarkable for long-standing ulcerative colitis led to a total colectomy and ileocolic anastomosis 8 years ago. Physical examination revealed enlarged right and left prostatic lobes with no apparent problem in the testis or phallus. PSA was 9.4 ng/ml. The patient underwent prostatic biopsies which showed prostatic adenocarcinoma, acinar type, Gleason score of 3 + 3 = 6, affecting 2% of the right lobe of the prostate, as well as high-grade PSS occupying 50% of the left lobe of the prostate. Chest CT-scan showed a 1.8 cm × 0.9 cm nodule in the right lower lung lobe [Figure 1]. Infectious or inflammatory etiologies were considered. A CT-scan guided FNA biopsy on the lung nodule to exclude any lung primary tumors. The biopsy showed malignant neoplasm with mixed spindle and epithelial cell features confirmed to be metastatic PSS with proper immunohistochemical stains [Figure 2]a,[Figure 2]b,[Figure 2]c,[Figure 2]d. Shortly after the lung biopsy, the patient had radical prostatectomy, which showed prostatic adenocarcinoma, acinar type, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6, occupying 5% of the right prostatic lobe, as well as a 4.0 cm × 3.5 cm × 3.0 cm cystic mass occupying 60% of the left prostatic lobe and all left seminal vesicles, which diagnosed as high grade PSS. The morphologic picture and the immunohistochemical profile of the PSS are identical to the lung nodular lesion [Figure 2]e and [Figure 2]f.
Figure 1: Chest computed tomography scan image show the right lower lobe nodule of the lung

Click here to view
Figure 2: (a) Papanicolaou stain smears show high grade spindle cell neoplasm. (b) H and E stained section from cell block shows sweeping fascicles of spindle cell lesion with nuclear atypia. (c) Cell block; prostatic specific antigen immunostains highlighted the large atypical epithelial cells. (d) Cell block; cytokeratin adverse event 1/3 immunostains is negative in the large atypical stromal cells. (e) Prostatectomy resection; left lobe shows prostatic stromal sarcoma. (f) Prostatectomy specimen; right lobe, prostatic adenocarcinoma, acinar, type, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6. (g) Neoplastic spindle cells on cytology. (h) Cytomorphology showing high grade spindle cells

Click here to view


Radiology

The initial pelvic CT-scan showed a 4.0 cm × 3.5 cm × 3.0 cm cystic mass occupying the left prostatic lobe and involving the left seminal vesicle. No pelvic lymphadenopathy identified. The staging abdominal CT scan showed areas of fibrosis and the ileocolic anastomosis with no edema or effusions. No abdominal lymphadenopathy identified. The chest CT scan showed a 1.8 cm × 0.9 cm nodule in the right lower lung lobe [Figure 1]. No pleural or pericardial effusion or lymphadenopathy were identified.

Cytology

Moderate to high cellular smears composed of pleomorphic large spindle cells with prominent nuclear atypia. Multiple atypical mitotic figures as well as focal areas of necrosis admixed with red blood cells (RBCs) extravasations are identified. The cells had a fascicular arrangement with focal storiform pattern with no glandular architectures were identified [Figure 2]a, [Figure 2]b, [Figure 2]g and [Figure 2]h.

Immunohistochemical findings

A properly controlled immunostain panel was performed on the cell block to determine the nature of the tumor. Differential diagnosis of this spindle cell tumor includes SSCC, malignant spindle cell melanoma, MSFT, ACT, metastatic FS, MPNST, PNET/ES, and LMS. The current case tumor cells were positive for CK AE1/AE3, PSA, PR, CD34, actin, desmin and vimentin, and negative for S100, TTF-1, napsin A, CK 7, CD117, ER, and melan A [Figure 2]c and [Figure 2]d.


 » Discussion Top


Prostatic stromal tumors (PST) are putatively derived from specialized stromal cells of prostate and include pure mesenchymal and mixed epithelial stromal (phyllodes) tumors. PST are classified into stromal tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) and PSS in 2004 WHO classification of prostate tumors.[6] STUMP has been previously classified under a variety of names including phyllodes tumor of the prostate, atypical stromal hyperplasia, cystosarcoma phyllodes, and cystic epithelial-stromal tumor. Gaudin et al.,[7] classified these lesions in 1998 as prostatic stromal lesions that were not obvious sarcomas, designated as STUMP,[8] reflecting the uncertain nature of the clinical course in affected patients. STUMP and PSS are often difficult to distinguish morphologically. Different parameters used to differentiate these two processes include cellularity, mitotic activity, necrosis, and extension into surrounding organs.[9] STUMP encompasses cellular spindle cell lesions of specialized prostatic stroma with or without epithelial component. STUMP lacks significant cellular atypia, mitotic activity, necrosis, or extraprostatic growth.

PSS are rare solid organs mesenchymal sarcomas that originate in the cells of the stromal prostate. PSS represents <0.1% of primary prostate malignancies in adults.[9] PSS affect male adults with age predilection between 25 and 86 years, approximately half of all reported cases of stromal sarcoma occur before the age of 50 years. PSS may pose difficult diagnostic challenges on cytology. The common clinical presentation of adult prostate sarcoma is urinary tract infections and urinary retention.[10] PSA levels are usually normal.[11] No known risk factors are described in literature for PSS.[12] Stromal sarcomas may arise de novo or may exist in association with either a preexistent or concurrent STUMP.[13] It is suggested that some STUMP cases to dedifferentiate to sarcomas in rare occasions.[14]

Gross examination of PSS demonstrates predominantly tan-white, solid, fleshy lesions ranging in size from 2 to 18 cm.[15] Occasionally, areas of edema, hemorrhage, or small cysts may be identified. Cytologically, PSS show moderate to high cellular smears composed of pleomorphic large spindle cells with prominent nuclear atypia. Multiple atypical mitotic figures as well as focal areas of necrosis admixed with RBCs extravasations are identified.[13] The cells had a fascicular arrangement with focal storiform pattern with no glandular architectures were identified. Grading of PSS as high grade or low grade was proposed in the AFIP fascicle,[14] which is preferred by authors. High-grade tumors based on increased cellularity, frequent mitoses, cytologic atypia, necrosis, and stromal overgrowth. Low-grade tumors are less atypical; prominent cellularity, appreciable mitoses, nuclear atypia, necrosis, and extraprostatic spread indicate malignant nature.[16] A 3-tier grading system for PSS has been proposed by some authors [Table 1].[17] Recurrent tumor of PSS may show higher grade features than an initial tumor.[18]
Table 1: Prostatic stromal sarcomas 3-tier grading system

Click here to view


Proper clinical history and radiological correlation as well as a wise use of immunocytochemistry stains are vital for diagnosing metastatic PSS, as the lung is the primary site for secondaries. PSS cells are positive for vimentin, CD34, PR, with variable reactivity to PSA, desmin, SMA, CK (AE1/AE3), and PAP, whereas they are negative for S100, CD117, TTF-1, and ER.[19] Spindle cell squamous cell carcinoma is one of the main differential diagnosis, tumor cells are positive for CK AE1/AE3, p63, or p40 and negative for PSA and PR. The other differential diagnosis is LMS which have cigar-shaped nuclei with perinuclear vacuoles; however, they are almost always CK AE1/AE3, PSA, PR, and EMA negative.[20] MSFT shows stag-horn shaped vasculature with ropy collage, and usually positive for CD34 and BCL-2;[21] however, it is usually negative for CD99, PSA, PR and CK AE1/AE3. ACT could pose similar tumor morphology with more spindle features; however, they are CK AE1/AE3, synaptophysin, and chromogranin positive and both CD99 and CD34 negative. Malignant melanoma (MM) could mimic the cytologic features of PSS; however, MM is positive for S100, melan A, HMB45, and negative for CK AE1/AE3, PSA, and PR.[22] [Table 2] shows the differential diagnosis with related the immunohistochemical stains as well as the molecular findings in each entity.
Table 2: IPOX for the differential diagnosis of prostatic stromal sarcoma

Click here to view



 » Competing Interests Statement by All Authors Top


The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


 » Authorship Statement by All Authors Top


All authors have contributed significantly and agree with the final manuscript.


 » Ethics Statement by All Authors Top


As this is a case report without identifiers, our institution does not require approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB).documentation in this respect.


 » List of Abbreviations (In Alphabetic Order) Top


ACT - Atypical carcinoid tumor

CK – Cytokeratin

CT - Computed tomography

EMA - Epithelial membrane antigen

ER - Estrogen receptor

FNA - Fine needle aspiration

FS - Fibrosarcoma

LMS - Leiomyosarcoma

MPNST - Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor

MSFT - Malignant solitary fibrous tumor

PAP - Papanicolaou

PNET/ES - Primitive neuroendocrine tumor/Ewing sarcoma

PR - Progesterone receptor

PSA - Prostatic specific antigen

PSS - Prostatic stromal sarcomas

RBC - Red blood cells.

SSCC - Sarcomatoid squamous cell carcinoma

TTF-1 - Thyroid transcription factor 1

 
 » References Top

1.
Egevad L, Carbin BE, Castellanos E, Hellstrom M, Valdman A. Atypical stromal hyperplasia of the prostate. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2008;42:484-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Herawi M, Epstein JI. Specialized stromal tumors of the prostate: A clinicopathologic study of 50 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:694-704.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Bostwick DG, Hossain D, Qian J, Neumann RM, Yang P, Young RH, et al. Phyllodes tumor of the prostate: Long-term followup study of 23 cases. J Urol 2004;172:894-9.   Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Lam KC, Yeo W. Chemotherapy induced complete remission in malignant phyllodes tumor of the prostate metastasizing to the lung. J Urol 2002;168:1104-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Tranesh, G., and Nassar, A. (2016). Metastatic Chordoma: A Diagnostic Challenge on Fine Needle Aspiration. Case Reports in Pathology, 2016.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
McCarthy RP, Zhang S, Bostwick DG, Qian J, Eble JN, Wang M, et al. Molecular genetic evidence for different clonal origins of epithelial and stromal components of phyllodes tumor of the prostate. Am J Pathol 2004;165:1395-400.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Löpez-Beltran A, Gaeta JF, Huben R, Croghan GA. Malignant phyllodes tumor of prostate. Urology 1990;35:164-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Hossain D, Meiers I, Qian J, MacLennan GT, Bostwick DG. Prostatic stromal hyperplasia with atypia: Follow-up study of 18 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008;132:1729-33.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Watanabe M, Yamada Y, Kato H, Imai H, Nakano H, Araki T, et al. Malignant phyllodes tumor of the prostate: Retrospective review of specimens obtained by sequential transurethral resection. Pathol Int 2002;52:777-83.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Schapmans S, Van Leuven L, Cortvriend J, Beelaerts W, Van Erps P. Phyllodes tumor of the prostate. A case report and review of the literature. Eur Urol 2000;38:649-53.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Tijare JR, Shrikhande AV, Shrikhande VV. Phyllodes type of atypical prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1999;162(3 Pt 1):803-4.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Gaudin PB, Rosai J, Epstein JI. Sarcomas and related proliferative lesions of specialized prostatic stroma: A clinicopathologic study of 22 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1998;22:148-62.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Tranesh G. Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS) and the Granulomatous Lung Diseases, Should We Mention The S Word!? J Am Soc Cytopathol 2015;4:S45.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kevwitch MK, Walloch JL, Waters WB, Flanigan RC. Prostatic cystic epithelial-stromal tumors: A report of 2 new cases. J Urol 1993;149:860-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Kerley SW, Pierce P, Thomas J. Giant cystosarcoma phyllodes of the prostate associated with adenocarcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992;116:195-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Young JF, Jensen PE, Wiley CA. Malignant phyllodes tumor of the prostate. A case report with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992;116:296-9.   Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ayala AG, Srigley JR, Ro JY, Abdul-Karim FW, Johnson DE. Clear cell cribriform hyperplasia of prostate. Report of 10 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1986;10:665-71.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Leong SS, Vogt PJ, Yu GS. Atypical stromal smooth muscle hyperplasia of prostate. Urology 1988;31:163-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Attah EB, Powell ME. Atypical stromal hyperplasia of the prostate gland. Am J Clin Pathol 1977;67:324-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Kandel P, Tranesh G, Nassar A, Bingham R, Raimondo M, Woodward TA, et al. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy using a novel fork-tip needle: A case control study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Yum M, Miller JC, Agrawal BL. Leiomyosarcoma arising in atypical fibromuscular hyperplasia (phyllodes tumor) of the prostate with distant metastasis. Cancer 1991;68:910-5.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Colletti SM, Tranesh GA, Whetsell CR, Chambers LN, Nassar A. High diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsy of soft tissue tumors: An institutional experience. Diagnostic Cytopathology 2016.  Back to cited text no. 22
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
Previous article Next article

    

  Site Map | Copyright and Disclaimer
© 2007 - CytoJournal | A journal by Cytopathology Foundation Inc with Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
New version online since 1st July '08
Open Access