A welcoming guide to social media for cytopathologists: Tips, tricks, and the best practices of social cytopathology
Fikret Dirilenoglu MD 1, Binnur Onal MD, FEBP, FIAC 2
1 Department of Pathology, Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
2 Department of Pathology, Ankara Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
|Date of Submission||05-Jan-2018|
|Date of Acceptance||24-May-2018|
|Date of Web Publication||11-Feb-2019|
Department of Pathology, Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
This guide provides an overview of social media (SoMe) use with the recent updates for the “cytopathologists and the ones interested in”. Our aim was to introduce the basic terms and rules, the potential benefits and risks, and some tips and tricks for using SoMe. The two most popular SoMe platforms, Facebook and Twitter, were the focus of this article. Thus far, many pathologists have already proved how efficiently the SoMe services could be utilized; the same applies specifically to the community of cytopathology. In our opinion, the more CPs are involved in SoMe, the more connected, productive, and stronger the community will become.
Keywords: Cytopathology, Facebook, social media, telepathology, Twitter
|How to cite this article:|
Dirilenoglu F, Onal B. A welcoming guide to social media for cytopathologists: Tips, tricks, and the best practices of social cytopathology. CytoJournal 2019;16:4
|How to cite this URL:|
Dirilenoglu F, Onal B. A welcoming guide to social media for cytopathologists: Tips, tricks, and the best practices of social cytopathology. CytoJournal [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 6];16:4. Available from: http://www.cytojournal.com/text.asp?2019/16/1/4/252014
Editorial/Peer Review Statement
To ensure the integrity and highest quality of CytoJournal publications, the review process of this manuscript was conducted under a double-blind model (authors are blinded for reviewers and vice versa) through automatic online system.
***“All knowledge is connected to all other knowledge. The fun is in making the connections.”
–Arthur C. Aufderheide
(1922–2013, palaeopathologist and expert on dissecting mummies) ***
| » Introduction|| |
What is social media
Social media (SoMe) is defined as a worldwide platform using various web-based applications, wherein individual users or groups create their profiles to connect and share their contents with other individuals or groups. The estimated number of global SoMe users has reached 1.96 billion and expected to increase some 2.5 billion by 2018. As of 2017, daily usage of SoMe by overall internet users amounted to 135 minutes. What distinguishes SoMe from the other media platforms is the way its content is generated. The ability to share easily, instantly, freely, and without borders has made SoMe a major player in communication with the world.
***“Knowledge is like money: to be of value it must circulate, and in circulating it can increase in quantity and hopefully, in value.”
(1908–1988, American author) ***
A brief manual and some basic terms for the new social media users
There are various SoMe platforms with a potential utility for “cytopathologists and the ones interested in”, such as Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Pinterest, LinkedIn, and YouTube. Above all, Twitter and Facebook are the most feasible hosts that have already gained the largest number of pathologists. In these two social networking platforms, there are thousands of active members including many experts around the world. It is very easy to sign up on these services (www.twitter.com and www.facebook.com) with an e-mail address and a unique username.
“Hashtag (#)” and “@” signs are typically used on both Facebook and Twitter. Hashtags are words or phrases preceded by a hash sign (#) and are used to identify messages on a specific topic. For example, #CytoPath is one of the key hashtags for the CPs. Hashtags are more frequently used on Twitter. The other commonly used cytopathology-related hashtags are #Cytopathology, #Cytology, #FNAFriday, and #PAPtest. The users can also use a certain hashtag to search a relevant topic by simply writing it into the search box. Later, the results could be listed separately as photographs, videos, or to see people who state an interest for that hashtag in their profile. To mention or tag a user in a post, “@” is prefaced by the name of a user of interest. An example of how to use a hashtag and “@” signs in a post (tweet) is depicted in [Figure 1]. A concise Twitter glossary for pathologists is listed in a recently published article.
|Figure 1: A “tweet” by Anne Mills, M.D., exemplifies the use of “at (@)” and “hashtag (#)” signs. (1) The name of a user or a page is represented by “@(username).” (2) Hashtags are used to refer to a general topic using “#(topic),” under which the relevant tweets are collected. (3) Another user(s) can be mentioned using “@(username)” within a tweet|
Click here to view
Some of the prominent cytopathology journals and societies have already taken part in Twitter such as Diagnostic Cytopathology (@DiagnosticCyto), Cancer Cytopathology (@CancerCytopath), Cytojournal (@CytoJ), the American Society of Cytopathology (@cytopathology) and, its previous president, the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (@PapSociety), the European Federation of Cytology Societies (@EFCytology), the British Association for Cytopathology (@CytopathologyJ), and the College of American Pathologists (@Pathologists) broadcasting new head-and-neck guideline recommendations for fine-needle aspirations.,,,,,,,, The publisher Karger's journal Acta Cytologica is affiliated with over fifty cytology societies worldwide on Twitter.
Currently, on Facebook, the “Cytopathology” group is in the forefront with over 17,000 members. In this page, the members mainly discuss unknown cases.
There is no character limit for Facebook posts, while Twitter presently allows up to 280 characters for each post. One can post up to four photographs in a single tweet, but Facebook allows up to thirty photographs in a post. Nevertheless, Twitter seems to be used more efficiently by CPs, since its design is simpler and more organized, posts are more pathology focused, and the pathologists leading the SoMe prefer to use Twitter more than Facebook. The major differences between Facebook and Twitter are listed in [Table 1].
|Table 1: Remarkable differences between the two most popular social media websites|
Click here to view
*** “Often, we are too slow to recognize how much and in what ways we can assist each other through sharing expertise and knowledge.”
(1949-, Barbadian politician) ***
Basic rules and potential risks for social media users
There are a few rules that anyone should be aware of before sharing contents in SoMe. The most important concern is the protection of patient privacy. Deidentification of patient characteristics by applying principal ethical rules is essential.
It would be reasonable to keep personal and professional contents separate since any personal sharing may be misinterpreted by the followers and an unprofessional content would damage an individual's professional image. The users may obtain two different profiles: one for personal and one for professional use. However, managing two different accounts would be challenging. Thankfully, most SoMe websites allow users to customize settings so as to determine who to see or not see any particular post.
One should also not give medical advice based on the limited and potentially misleading information. All the recommendations should be considered rather as “curbside” opinions.
The users should take precautions for several inherent risks that every SoMe platform carry. Hacking and scam activities have been reported occasionally on Twitter and Facebook, so every user should conform to each platform's security and privacy policies to protect accounts and personal data. Using SoMe unduly would be time-consuming and prevent performance and productivity with a potential of causing addiction. Excessive use also bears health risks due to physical inactivity.
*** “Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality.”
(1357–1419, high lama of Tibetan Buddhism) ***
The benefits of using social media
Cytopathologists and the others who are interested in cytopathology can benefit from SoMe in many ways. There are already plenty of well-organized pathology groups and pages, in which many users actively engage every day. In these platforms, sharing tough cases with the cytopathology community will most of the time initiate instant case discussions. The more well prepared the case – supported with high-quality images and sufficient clinical information, the more it will elicit attention and response from the other users.
The posts shared in these groups are not only “unknown cases” but also may be some interesting aspects or educational points, such as a typical example of a cytological finding. Some members gather interrelated inputs from multiple users, reorganize them, and present as easy-to-glance notes [Figure 2]. For those who may not attend a major conference, many key points from the lectures are shared in these platforms. For this purpose, “live-tweeting” is often organized by Twitter users during an event where you post comments while the event is taking place. In a live-tweeting activity during the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology meeting in 2015, a total of 16,524 tweets had been generated by 662 users on Twitter. PathCast, an Internet-based video conferencing website on pathology, has started featuring educational videos in 2016, also broadcasting on cytopathology, such as “The Atypical Thyroid FNA: What's Atypical and What Isn't” by Edmund Cibas. Real-time discussions provide enormous information and update to the followers. For the ones who miss to join these activities, they can easily retrieve what had been shared by searching the relevant keyword or hashtag.
|Figure 2: A growing number of useful compilations are made by the social media pathologists. Special “bodies” in pathology compiled by Vijay Shankar, M.D.|
Click here to view
E-learning platforms, for example, Eurocytology (#eurocytology), have been developed to serve as a means of cytopathology teaching and assessing. Eurocytology is a multilingual platform with the aims of harmonizing and increasing access to training in clinical cytology since 2008. In 2013, it received on an average 50,000 visits among which 49.1% used Eurocytology as part of their training, with 75,000 pages downloaded per month. After being online on Twitter, the web traffic, which refers to the number of users visiting a particular website, displayed 534,681 users in 2016.
There are other promises that SoMe offers to the CPs. Virtual journal clubs serve as article discussion platforms typically including the authors and experts on the topic from various fields at a scheduled time, for example, @path_JC. Posting a link of one's own publication would be purposed in self-promoting and increasing citations. Strengthening the interactions between the patients and CPs, as well as with the other disciplines, has been more feasible. Live educational videos by attaching special equipment on microscopes or using applications on a smartphone have made pathology education more accessible and effective. Periscope is a live video-streaming application which has been used by some university-based pathologists, such as Jerad M. Gardner, MD (University of Arkansas) and Sanjay Mukhopadhyay, MD (Cleveland Clinic), to present their educational pathology videos or seminars. Participants in these online teaching activities are also allowed to interact with the instructor during the sessions. A “Tweetup” may be organized to bring Twitter users together to meet up in person, especially in pathology courses and conferences.
*** “The only thing to do with good advice is to pass it on. It is never of any use to oneself.”
(1854–1900, Irish playwright, poet, and writer)***
Tips and tricks for a better social media experience
Newcomers in Tweeter
You may start practicing with following the leading SoMe members and pages in pathology and cytopathology. A comprehensive list of “who to follow” by Dr. Rose Wu from the University of Pennsylvania would be helpful which is mentioned below:
(https://twitter.com/smlungpathguy/status/848575088811282436; accessed November 30, 2017).
One does not have to buy special equipment to take pretty microscopic images. Smartphones are not only able to capture high-quality images but also allow users for creative editing. Photographing through an ocular of a microscope could be achieved using Dr. Morrison's free-hand technique described by Montana-based pathologist Dr. Annie Morrison (https://youtu.be/cfd9ViHBlR4; accessed November 30, 2017). Optimizing and watermarking images are easy using appropriate apps on smartphones. Suggested apps for both purposes are “Enlight” for iPhone users and “Snapseed” for Android users. For iPhone users, to magnify a particular finding in a picture, Dr. Pembe Oltulu (@pembeoltulu), a pathologist in Turkey, described a technique which is called “to pembify (#pembify)” using the Markup tool.
What is more, sharing images is also within the scope of telecytopathology, which aims to provide an easy approach for diagnosis (rapid-on-site evaluation, intraoperative diagnosis, consultation, ancillary tests, etc.), teaching, testing, archiving, and quality assessment. Nowadays, some institutions offer comprehensive subspecialty consultations for diagnosis and treatment through their digital portals.
An innovative e-learning platform, developed as a European Project and focused on cytological training at European standard through telepathology, CyTest, has the feature of deep integration between virtual microscopy and the training system allowing quantitative measurement of image comprehension and testing. The software is distributed as open source and available on GitHub (a software repository hosting service). The platform is also being considered, in collaboration with the European Federation of Cytology Societies, as a basis of an eQUATE (Quality Assurance, Training and Examinations Committee) test at European level.
To follow discussions in a post on Facebook, there is an option “Turn on notifications for this post” in the top right corner of the post [Figure 3]. After activating this option, you will get notifications for each new response to that post. You may choose to deactivate anytime you want by simply turning it off. Currently, Twitter does not provide an option to follow a tweet. However, you may save a tweet of your interest to review it anytime using “Add to Moment” option in the top right corner of that particular tweet.
|Figure 3: Here, we depict an example of how to follow a topic of interest easily on Facebook activating the option “Turn on notifications for this post”|
Click here to view
*** “Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses-especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.”
–Leonardo da Vinci
(1452–1519, an eminent artist and intellectual of the Italian Renaissance)***
| » Conclusion|| |
SoMe has revolutionized our capabilities of communication worldwide by providing an easily accessible, dynamic, fast-paced, and limitless platform. Knowledge and experience have never been transferred in such a rapid and powerful way to people around the world before. According to Karl Popper's philosophy of science, a theory should not only be verified but should also be tested and even refused to be considered as scientific. Humanity and the advance of science throughout history may be likened to a baby crawling in a huge labyrinth through a range of obstacles, including testability, verifiability, and objective evaluation. Once the enlightenment of this labyrinth has been reached, road maps, flowcharts, and algorithms will be created so that others will be able to use the knowledge without getting lost. Today's dynamic and limitless interactions provided by SoMe platforms seem to enable and facilitate to remain within the bounds of scientific and critical thinking required by falsifiability.
Cytopathologists should be well educated about the potential benefits and pitfalls of SoMe mentioned in this article. With the ever-growing professional network, the community of cytopathology is becoming increasingly more productive, much stronger with synergy, and endeavoring to contribute to the scientific development for a greater patient care.
*** “Two there are who are never satisfied — the lover of the world and the lover of knowledge.”
–Jalaluddin Mevlana Rumi
(1207–1273, poet, jurist, theologian, and Sufi mystic) ***
We would like to thank Dr. Anne Mills (University of Virginia) and Dr. Vijay Shankar (Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences) for allowing us to use and adapt their tweets in this manuscript.
| » Competing Interests Statement by All Authors|| |
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
| » Authorship Statement by All Authors|| |
All authors of this article declare that we qualify for authorship as defined by ICMJE http://www.icmje.org/#author.
Each author has participated sufficiently in the work and take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content of this article.
FD participated in the design of the study and has drafted the manuscript. BO participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Each author acknowledges that this final version was read and approved.
| » Ethics Statement by All Authors|| |
This study was conducted within the terms of ethical standards stipulated in the declaration of Helsinki. Authors take responsibility to maintain relevant documentation in this respect.
| » List of Abbreviations (In Alphabetic Order)|| |
CPs – Cytopathologists and the ones interested in cytopathology SoMe – Social media.
| » References|| |
Obar JA, Wildman S. Social media definition and the governance challenge: An introduction to the special issue. Telecomm Policy 2015;39:745-50.
Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: Benefits, risks, and best practices. P&T 2014;39:491-520.
Madrigal E, Jiang XS, Roy-Chowdhuri S. The professional twitter account: Creation, proper maintenance, and continuous successful operation. Diagn Cytopathol 2017;45:621-8.
Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology. Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Twitter page. Available from: https://www.twitter.com/PapSociety
. [Last accessed on 2017 Nov 30].
European Federation of Cytology Societies. European Federation of Cytology Societies Twitter page. Available from: https://www.twitter.com/EFCytology
. [Last accessed on 2017 Nov 30].
Fuller MY, Gardner JM, Jiang XS. Social cytopathology: Building a stronger cytopathology community through social media. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:891-5.
Crane GM, Gardner JM. Pathology image-sharing on social media: Recommendations for protecting privacy while motivating education. AMA J Ethics 2016;18:817-25.
Jiang XS, Madrigal E, Roy-Chowdhuri S. A twitter primer: Dos and don'ts for cytopathologists. Diagn Cytopathol 2017;45:577-9.
Lepe M, Gardner JM. Fine social aspiration: Twitter as a voice for cytopathology. Diagn Cytopathol 2017;45:705-13.
Cohen D, Allen TC, Balci S, Cagle PT, Teruya-Feldstein J, Fine SW, et al.
#InSituPathologists: How the #USCAP2015 meeting went viral on Twitter and founded the social media movement for the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology. Mod Pathol 2017;30:160-8.
Bois MC, Maleszewski JJ. Virtual journal club: An example of the growing importance of social media in pathology. Cardiovasc Pathol 2018;32:30-1.
Quintana DS, Doan NT. Twitter article mentions and citations: An exploratory analysis of publications in the American journal of psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 2016;173:94.
Isom J, Walsh M, Gardner JM. Social media and pathology: Where are we now and why does it matter? Adv Anat Pathol 2017;24:294-303.
Fuller MY, Mukhopadhyay S, Gardner JM. Using the periscope live video-streaming application for global pathology education: A brief introduction. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016;140:1273-80.
Fuller MY, Allen TC. Let's have a tweetup: The case for using Twitter professionally. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016;140:956-7.
Morrison AO, Gardner JM. The morrison technique: A free-hand method for capturing photomicrographs using a smartphone. J Cutan Pathol 2016;43:472-4.
Ghofrani M, Ocal IT. Telecytology. In: Önal B, editor. Cytopathology. Istanbul: Quintessence; 2016. p. 525-9.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Digital Pathology Consultation Portal. Available from: https://www.pathconsult.upmc.com/
. [Last accessed on 2017 Dec 25].
Lianas L, Pras ME, Musu E, Podda S, Frexia F, Ovcin E, et al
. CyTest – An innovative open-source platform for training and testing in cythopathology. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2016;228:674-81.
Popper K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. English Edition. London and New York: Routledge; 1992.
Uhri M, Önal B. The route of science: Labyrinths and algorithms – Inspirations by human papillomavirus testing and cervical cancer. Cytojournal 2015;12:24.
] [Full text]
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]